Competition & Credit Judging Rules
Most questions can be answered by reading the rules below. If you still need assistance after reviewing them, please visit our Contact Page and email your query — a member of the team will respond as soon as possible. Suggestions and feedback are welcome, as we aim to maintain transparency and clarity in all aspects of judging and competition. This document outlines how the competition and credit systems function, helping to avoid ambiguity and reduce the potential for misunderstanding. It has been prepared to promote openness and ensure consistency in how these processes are carried out. Written contributions for future updates to this document are welcome. To learn more about the credit system, please visit our website Introduction
|
Ethos and Conduct
Entering Work for Assessment or Competition
Submitting work for Standard or Higher Credits, or for competition, should be approached in the true spirit of sharing, learning, and sportsmanship — not only in healthy competition with others, but also with oneself.
If the outcome does not meet your expectations, we encourage you to make full use of the judges’ feedback — both through direct conversation and via the detailed assessment sheets. These insights are valuable for reflection and future improvement.
Please note: the judges’ decision is final.
All members are expected to uphold respectful and professional conduct at all times. This includes treating fellow members, judges, and anyone the Guild engages with dignity, courtesy, and respect.
Bullying, harassment, or discrimination of any kind will not be tolerated.
If you feel you are unable to align with this ethos, we respectfully ask that you reconsider entering work for judging or attending in this capacity.
Registration of Entries Registration of Entries for Judging and Exhibition
Eligibility and Process
Completing the Registration Form
Classification of Entrants - DivisionsEntrants are categorised into divisions based on both experience and credit status: Entrants are encouraged to compete
|
Presenting Specimens at the Conference
Entry Terms, Presentation, and Exhibition GuidelinesBy entering, all participants acknowledge that their work is submitted entirely at their own risk, and agree to indemnify the Guild of Taxidermists against any liability arising from their entry. Legal Compliance (CITES / Article 10)Where applicable, entrants must hold a valid Article 10 Certificate (or other relevant CITES documentation) for any Annex A specimen entered.
Specimen Delivery & Judging Schedule
Upon arrival:
Please follow the directions of Guild officials to ensure a smooth and timely process. The specimen exhibition room will open for viewing at a scheduled time on Friday evening. Non-Competitive Exhibition WorkIn addition to competition entries, members are encouraged to bring other non-competitive taxidermy or related work — such as recreations, crustaceans, woodcarvings, sculpture, etc. — to display and share with fellow members.
Photography and Image UseYour work will be photographed as part of the documentation process. Specimen Display ConsiderationsIf you intend to bring a large number of specimens, or entries, that may require substantial space, you must confirm the practicalities and logistics of this with the Registrar before submitting your registration. |
Judging of Works
All entries must remain anonymous, with no identifying marks or labels on or near the specimen.
For Standard Credit and Higher Credit categories, specimens are not judged in comparison to each other, but rather assessed individually on their own merit.
Each specimen is evaluated using a structured Judging Form, with scores awarded out of a maximum of 100 points. Based on the score achieved:
A Standard Credit may be awarded (70-89 points)
A Higher Credit may be awarded (90-100 points)
To ensure consistency across judging years, the Guild reserves the right to adjust the scoring thresholds when necessary — for instance, when a new or independent judge is appointed and scoring needs calibration against historical standards.
Judges are appointed by the Guild Committee and will be of Specialist or Accredited status.
Independent or visiting judges may be invited at the Committee’s discretion, provided they possess the appropriate expertise.
Each category will be judged by at least one named judge.
Where possible, independent judges will be used.
Members interested in training to become a judge may observe the process during the conference. Spaces are limited, and members must put their names forward in advance to be considered.
Judges will declare a conflict of interest to work presented where the Judge is aware, through recognition of the entry (by recognition of style, personal , commercial or guild relationships etc), who the entry belongs to . In such occurrences, the entry will be passed to an alternative impartial judge for scoring.
Judges are permitted to enter work for Credits and Competitions. However, if they are judging a category in which they have entered:
They must declare a conflict of interest to the other judges.
They must leave the judging area while their work is being evaluated.
Competition awards are determined by the judging panel and include:
Best Bird
Best Mammal
Best Game Head
Best Fish
Best Cased Specimen
Best Groundwork
Breakthrough Award
Best of Show
Members who enter work at the conference are also eligible to vote in:
People’s Choice Award
Themed Competition
Members’ Best of Show
A Judge or delegate may not vote for their own work. If a Judge’s work is put forward for a competition award, they must declare their interest and leave the judging area while voting takes place.
All specimens must be fully dried and finished to be eligible for judging.
Any specimen deemed offensive or disreputable to the practice of taxidermy will be removed from display.
Specimens that are overly concealed by habitat, casework, or pose (e.g. head under wing) may not be judged.
Members unable to attend the conference may submit work for judging on a case-by-case basis, with the following conditions:
Entry is subject to committee approval in exceptional circumstances
A fee is payable per person
Remote entries are not eligible for competitions
Each specimen receives a Judging Form that highlights:
Areas of satisfactory or high standard
Areas for further improvement
These forms, together with your portfolio, form a valuable record of progress and achievement within the Guild and can support both personal development and professional advancement.
Entries for Higher Credit must be accompanied by a portfolio demonstrating:
Reference material
Proof of sculpting or modifying your own manikin
Without a portfolio, the entry will not be judged.
In the Standard Credit category, the use of a self-made, anatomically accurate manikin is seen as a higher level of skill compared to using a commercial form.
Fine art entries that include a taxidermy specimen will be judged only on the taxidermy element of the work, based on the Guild's definition of taxidermy.
Anthropomorphic or decorative works (e.g., dressed or altered animals) are not eligible for judging.
Recreations and similar works will be judged by specialists whose work most closely aligns with the submitted specimen(s).
New Category for Judging “Verbal Feedback”
This category is designed for those beginning their taxidermy journey (but may be used by all attending Guild events) to give 1:1 support and guidance together with increasing the overall judging capacity at events: helping to avoid limiting the number of credit entries each member can submit.
Feedback will be provided verbally by the most qualified Guild members available on the day.
This approach is intended to offer more direct, practical guidance , which can often provide more detailed and extensive critique and solutions than written notes. Where possible, and if agreed by the entrant, a score sheet will be filled out during the feedback appointment to assist the entrant and decisions for competition winners.
If the specimen is deemed by the Guild judge to be of a quality that could reach or exceed the credit score thresholds, the option for a formal credit assessment is available - If a specimen is scored for credit assessment, this will replace the verbal feedback booking with feedback being provided on the written score sheet.
Novice Competition Judging
Placings in the Novice Competitions can be determined, if required, solely by judges’ opinions, without a scoring system for entries made for feedback only.
Any specimen judged for credits or receiving a credit will also be included in the competition results.
Identification of Works During Assessment The identity of the makers of individual works will only be released after judging has taken place. Any identifying marks must be covered. Members are expected to enter into the spirit of this practice when deciding on the peoples’ choice and the theme competition. Portfolio When working toward building your knowledge of the generic appearance of a species or toward Credit or Higher Credit awards, it is normal practice to gather together a portfolio to assist with the creation of your work, this is a normal and essential part of the creative process, particularly when working towards gathering knowledge of the generic appearance of individual species. In its most basic form, the portfolio would contain the reference used when mounting your specimen, measurement sheets or copies and images of the body form you used or sculpted. When having your work judged for a Higher Credits, it is compulsory to provide a portfolio of reference for each of your entries. This should contain sufficient material for the Judges to determine the accuracy of your mount particularly if your specimen has an unusual characteristic that is illustrated in the mount. You also need to show the manikin used for the mount was of your own making. Refer to the Portfolio document for more details. If you are entering work for judging for Standard Credits, members are encouraged to present a portfolio for each specimen submitted, with at least the reference images used and of the manikin for each specimen. Only one of the three higher credit specimens required in each category to become a Master may be on a commercial or altered commercial form. You may also wish to include details that illustrate the variety and/or amount of work you may have gone to in creating your groundwork or casework, or anything that informs the Judges or members of your skills and how you have used those skills. The quality of your portfolio can be a key element in improving and maintaining the quality of your taxidermy. The content of your portfolio over the basic content described is your decision. Members are encouraged to take advantage of the one-to-one critique on offer from the
Judges during the conference. |
Competitions
By default, all works are entered into the competitions unless you have crossed the exemption boxes on your registration sheet.
The exhibits are judged against the criteria detailed under the competition headings to see which fulfils the criteria to fullest extent.
Judging Forms are not completed for the competitions. At the discretion of the committee there may be on occasion multiple placements if work is considered of an equitable standard.
Where there are three placements, first second third in each competition, ribbons are awarded for each place. However, only one place can be awarded to each person in each category. For example, one person cannot win a first and second place in the Birds Novice category.
Birds Professional | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
Birds Amateur | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
Birds Novice | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
Best Amateur Exhibit - JHT Supplies Trophy | 1st | ||
Best Novice Exhibit - Bari Logan Trophy | 1st |
Mammal Professional | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
Mammal Amateur | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
Mammal Novice | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
Fish/Reptile Professional | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
Fish/Reptile Amateur | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
Fish/Reptile Novice | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
Game Head Professional | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
Game Head Amateur | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
Game Head Novice | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
Osteology Professional | 1st | ||
Osteology Amateur | 1st | ||
Osteology Novice | 1st |
Competitions in Relation to Standard and Higher Credit Status Any specimen that is regarded highly when assessed for Standard or Higher Credit does not automatically go on to win in any competition; all elements of the work are taken into consideration. The level of understanding of all of the creative processes which includes planning, technical difficulty, composition, time scale of production, originality, creativity, choice of species and pose, are all considered. Wagstaffe Trophy for the Best Cased Mount
This is simply for the best cased specimen; the case may be commercial or your own work. The groundwork could be entirely modelled by its maker or many ready made elements may be used. Any work which exhibits greater skills of the maker, may score more highly, this includes any work on the production of the case or the groundwork.
Norfolk Trophy for The Best Groundwork The complexity of groundwork can match any taxidermy specimen in its opportunity for research and technical production. The work may be cased or uncased, contain preserved or artificial elements of foliage, water, ice, rock-work, snow, riverbed, woodland floor or man-made environment, the choice is endless. The work will be judged on its, composition, overall aesthetic appeal, technical difficulty, time-scale of production. The Judges will be looking at how accurately the work represents a particular environment, how elements relate to each other, the accuracy of detail, its complexity, its theme, does it tell a story and originality. A portfolio would support any work entered, which is entirely down to individual choice. All work must be created by the named entrant any ready made items purchased or found must be identified. Themed Competition For each conference a theme is chosen, from which, members must create piece/s of work that includes their taxidermy work that relate to that theme. This is a test of creativity, originality, innovation or just to be sparklingly brilliant. People’s Choice Members who have entered specimens for judging or display are invited to choose their favourite piece of work from this year’s conference exhibits. Consider how you would make your choice. Examine each and consider what you think should come top of your list, consider the scale of the work, type, technical difficulty, cased or uncased, complexity, the overall aesthetics of the work, is it all created by the same person. There is a lot to consider and the choice is yours. When undertaking this task, it is important to understand the impact the size of a specimen can have on your judgement, or its rarity, the ‘WOW’ factor. Just because it’s Big or Unusual does not mean it is automatically worthy of admiration. The first step to take in this is to look past the size and species and look at the craftsmanship and all those details which make something a good piece of taxidermy in all its facets. Breakthrough Judges Choice, Best of Show The winning specimen is to be chosen from the winners from all categories and is a personal choice of each Judge. Supervised Work We recognise that doing work under supervision is a great way to improve the standard of your work and the Guild thinks that this should be encouraged. With this in mind we are holding a new competition, “Supervised Work”. So you can now enter that special piece of work done on a course, or under individual / group instruction. This competition is open to Novices only. Trophy Engraving Policy Previous trophy winners must return their trophy to the guild committee on the next annual conference date. If the previous winner will not be attending the conference, trophies must be returned prior to the annual conference date by shipping to a committee member. New winners have the responsibility of having the trophy engraved with their name and the year it was awarded. The cost of this will be reimbursed by the committee on request with a receipt. Issues such as lack of engraving space and any damage to or loss of trophies must be reported to the committee. Guild’s Definition of Taxidermy The sculptural representation of animal/s with the object of creating the illusion of life of the species concerned, utilising preserved parts of the original animal and or elements reproduced in part or in full. The crucial element is the work must represent a moment or narrative of the animal’s appearance, behaviours or function. For the purposes of assessment anthropomorphic specimens will not be judged. |